Friday, May 3, 2019
Inner City Violence Video Lecture Critique Coursework
Inner City Violence Video Lecture reappraisal - Coursework ExampleThe speakers main point appears credible given that the evidence is in the fantastic outcomes that he gives. The theme is credible as it tries to combine social science, street reality, and moral urgency. However, the presentation seems exaggerate as the speaker either appeared too unreserved or got too far along the bringing dismissing the beliefs of minorities that policing or drug policy is an economic scheme to reinstate slavery, prior to admitting that it is essentially justified (Kennedy, 2011).I agree with the speaker that there is a socially built illusion. This is justified by the way he mobilizes the traditions of the imposing escapade tale to illustrate what people should have already known. It is true that everyone who engaged in the city evil crisis shares a lot of character traits with each other than any other someone involved shares with anyone else.I also agree that people in a community, such as cops, annoyance victims, shooters, and the families all begin from one point in life. In fact, they are the same people caught up in extreme circumstances, rather than a permanently and radically different kind o various(prenominal) as some might think.Despite the fact that I agree with the above issues as presented, I disagree with the speakers point that the urban communities with high rates of criminal cases have a breakdown within the three parts namely the victims, the police, and the residents. According to him, the three have fake perceptions about(predicate) each other, making them unable to deal with crime appropriately. This is not actually the case because every individual has a role to play as an element of society, and the failure to keep peace ought not to be a one-groups role. Further, I disagree with his motive to show the reason as to why crime decreased during the 1990s because it fails to address some earlier theories that relate to his story (Harding, 2010). The presentation, and the book in oecumenical is a must
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.